This judgment merely disposes of a review application and a connected condonation of delay application without any substantive reasoning, finding, or application of law. The court held that no ground for review was made out and disposed of both matters.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 10.04.cao.854.13.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (O) NO.854/2013
IN MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION (REVIEW) NO.4098/2013 IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 55/2011 (Shri Bhimaji s/o Patru Hanwate vs. State of Maharashtra and others )
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders
Mr. S.A. Marathe, Advocate for petitioner/applicant
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK & A.M. BADAR, JJ. DATED : 10th April, 2015.
Heard.
No ground has been made out for reviewing the order dated 31.8.2012 in Public Interest Litigation No.55/2011.
Both, the Civil Application seeking condonation of delay as well as Miscellaneous Civil Application for review, stand disposed of.
JUDGEJUDGE
sahare
Shri Bhimaji s/o Patru Hanwate
State of Maharashtra and others
Vasanti A. Naik
A. M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court