The High Court of Judicature at Bombay allowed Civil Application No.80 of 2015, permitting a review of the earlier order in Writ Petition No.4678 of 2009, finding sufficient cause.
Civil Application No.80 of 2015 allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Review petition placed on 10th June 2015.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CAO80
1
ssp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.80 OF 2015 IN
REVIEW PETITION NO.41 OF 2015 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.4678 OF 2009
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
Mr.S.R.Nargolkar a/w Ms Tejashri Gawade i/b
Mr.V.S.Kapse for the Applicant
Ms Pavitra Manesh i/b Mr.M.S.Topkar for the Respondent
No.1.
CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
A.S.GADKARI,JJ.
DATE : APRIL 23, 2015.
P.C.
1Heard the learned counsel for the
applicant and the learned counsel for
the writ petitioner. In view of the
averments made in the application,
sufficient cause is made out. Civil
Application is allowed in terms of
prayer clause (a).
2Place the Review Petition on 10th
June 2015 at 2.35 p.m in Chamber.
(A.S.GADKARI,J)(A.S.OKA,J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether sufficient cause is made out to allow the civil application regarding the writ petition.
S.R. Nargolkar (a/w Tejashri Gawade)
Respondent No.1
A.S. Oka
A.S. Gadkari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court