Krushna Shrawan Saksule (Died) Thr. His Special Power of Attorney Holder Satish Vitthalrao Saksule v. M.I.D.C. Thr. Its Chief Executive Officer, Amravati and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
CIVIL APPLICATION (CAF) NOS. 1428 & 1429 of 2015 ON FIRST APPEAL NO. 445 OF 2012
MIDC Amravati Vs. Krushna Shrawan Saksule & Ors.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's Order
Shri M. M. Agnihotri Adv for appellant.
CORAM: A. S. CHANDURKAR J.
Dated: 28th SEPTEMBER, 2015.
Considering reasons mentioned in the application the delay in
bringing on record the legal representatives of the cross objector after setting aside abatement stands condoned. Applications are allowed and legal representatives are permitted to be brought on record in the cross objection. Applications are disposed of.
JUDGE
svk
2
3
4
5
MIDC Amravati
Krushna Shrawan Saksule & Ors.
A. S. CHANDURKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court