94 of 2015 vat IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
Interim relief granted via innocent injunction order is not treated as establishing the Case of harassment by the respondent wife.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CAM 94 of 2015
vat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 94 OF 2015 IN
FAMILY COURT APPEAL No. 55 OF 2015
Umakant Basavraj Masali ….Applicant/Appellant vs.
Sou.Surekha Umakant Masali ….Respondent
Mr.Milind Deshpande for Appellant Mr. Priyal Sarda for Respondent
CORAM : V. M. KANADE & Dr. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : OCTOBER 14, 2015 P.C. :
1/2
Vaishali Tikam
Court, dismissing his petition for annulment on the ground of mental disorder and in the appeal, civil application is taken out by the Applicant.
[Dr. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.] [ V. M. KANADE, J.]
2/2
Umakant Basavraj Masali
Sou. Surekha Umakant Masali
V. M. KANADE
Dr. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
