The Court allowed an application for condonation of a 94-day delay in filing a Civil Appeal against a Family Court (Stamp) Judgment, noting the respondent's absence.
Condonation of delay of 94 days for filing appeal is granted; Civil Application allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Dixit
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.89 OF 2014 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL (STAMP) NO.6618 OF 2014
Vidyadhar Mansing Kurlekar .… Applicant V/s. Sunita Vidyadhar Kurlekar …. Respondent
Applicant is present in person.
None for the Respondent.
CORAM : V.M. KANADE &
DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.J. DATE : 8 TH OCTOBER, 2015.
P.C. :
3. Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).
[DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.] [V.M. KANADE, J.]
1/1
CAM-89-14==.doc
1 issue framed by the court
Whether condonation of delay of 94 days in filing the Appeal is justified.
Vidyadhar Mansing Kurlekar
Sunita Vidyadhar Kurlekar
V.M. KANADE
SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
