The High Court of Bombay recalled the Registrar's order dismissing a restoration application due to office objections, held notice to respondent unnecessary as the defect predated admission, and restored the Family Court Appeal.
Recall of Registrar order; Restoration of Family Court Appeal (ST) No.11045 of 2015.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
p3 CAM 344 OF 2015.doc
vks
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.344 OF 2015 IN
FAMILY COURT APPEAL (ST) NO.11045 OF 2015.
Shikha Kapil Sapra … Applicant. V/s. Kapil Jagish Sapra …. Respondent
Mr. Nikhilesh Pote, for the applicant.
CORAM : V.M. KANADE &
DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : 20th OCTOBER, 2015.
P.C. :
board.
1
p3 CAM 344 OF 2015.doc
is allowed. The Family Court Appeal (ST) No.11045 of 2015 is restored.
[DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.] [V. M. KANADE, J.]
2
p3 CAM 344 OF 2015.doc
C E R T I F I C A T E
Certified to be true and correct copy of the original signed order.
3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether notice to respondent is necessary for recalling the registrar's order dismissing the restoration application.
Shikha Kapil Sapra
Kapil Jagish Sapra
V.M. Kanade
Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
