The State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Anr. v. Shri. Pandurang Bhau Karanjkar and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cai-200.14
1
ash
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.200 OF 2014 IN
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.112 OF 2012
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders.
Shri A.B. Vagyani, Government Pleader and Mrs.M.P. Thakur, AGP for the Applicants.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.K.MENON, JJ DATED : 22ND JANUARY 2015
P.C.:
. Perused the affidavit dated 14th January 2015 filed by Shri Santosh Arun Patil, the Officer on Special Duty, Co-operation, Marketing and Textile Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai. The time granted by this Court under the order dated 28th August 2014 to take appropriate decision has expired long back. Now the extension of time has been sought by this Application till 31st March 2015. In normal course, such a longer extension cannot be granted. However, in the affidavit of Shri Santosh Arun Patil,
2cai-200.14
ash
there is an assurance given in Paragraph 4 that the State Government will take a final policy decision by 31st March 2015. In view of the statements made in Paragraph 4 that we are inclined to extend the time.
(A.K.MENON, J) (A.S.OKA, J)
Applicants
A.S. OKA
A.K. MENON
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court