Allowed

Mr. Shakeel Ahmed Khalid Ahmed Ansari v. Maharashtra Housing Area Development Authority (Mhada)

Bombay HC6 Feb 2015CAF/475/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bombay, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction, granted an urgent order returning the original Trade License marked as Exhibit '40' in S.C. Suit No. 1453 of 2009 to the applicant to facilitate its renewal. The court permitted substitution of the original with a certified true copy pending the return of the document.

What did the court decide?

The Registrar is directed to return the original Trade License (Exhibit '40') to the applicant and permitted to substitute it with a certified true copy. Applicant directed to file an undertaking to p

Mr. Shakeel Ahmed Khalid Ahmed Ansari Vs… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2015)

¶1

pr18 caf475-15.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.475 OF 2015 IN

¶4

FIRST APPEAL NO.1284 OF 2014

¶5

Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders. Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders

¶6

Mr.Ajinkya Palav i/b Mr.P.J.Thorat for the applicant

¶7

Mr.G.B.Walawalkar i/b Mr.Shankar Prataprao Thorat for the respondent

¶8

CORAM : K.K.TATED, J. DATED : 06/02/2015

¶9

PC :

¶10

1 Not on board. At the request of Advocate for the Applicant, matter is taken on board for urgent orders.

¶11

2 This application is preferred by original plaintiff for return of original document i.e. Original Trade License marked as Exhibit '40' in S.C. Suit No.1453 of 2009 for the purpose of renewal.

¶12

3 The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the last date of renewal is 31.03.2015. He submits that for renewal they

1/3

Mohite

pr18 caf475-15.doc

have to produce the Original Trade License before the Authority without which it is not possible to get the renewal of the same. He further submits that applicant is ready and willing to file an undertaking that as and when this court calls upon them, they will bring the Original Trade License before this court. He submits that applicant is ready to place on record photo copy of Original Trade License duly certified by the Competent Authority in place of Exhibit 40.

¶17

4 Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and as applicant requires Original Trade License marked Exhibit 40 in S.C.Suit No.1453 of 2009, I am satisfied that the applicant has made out a case for allowing Civil Application. Hence, following order:

¶18

(A) Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) which reads thus:

¶19

“(a) That by an Order of this Hon'ble Court, the Registrar, Appellate Side of the Hon'ble Court, Bombay, be directed to return the original document i.e. Original Trade License marked as Exhibit '40' in S.C.Suit

2/3

Mohite

pr18 caf475-15.doc

No.1453 of 2009 to the Applicant and be pleased to permit the Applicant to substitute the original Trade License by furnishing the true copy thereof.”

¶24

(B) Applicant to file an undertaking that as and when this court calls upon them, they will bring the Original Trade License before this court and undertakes to place on record photo copy of the Original Trade License duly certified by the Competent Authority.

(K.K.TATED, J.)

3/3

Mohite

Mr. Shakeel Ahmed Khalid Ahmed Ansari v. Maharashtra Housing Area Development Authority (Mhada)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr. Shakeel Ahmed Khalid Ahmed Ansari v. Maharashtra Housing Area Development Authority (Mhada)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri Ramesh Kumar Wadhwa Vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and 3 Ors.

M/S Apul Textiles Pvt. Ltd. Vs Mrs. Kavita Sapan Das

Shri. Ramji Sakharam Rao Vs Fatima Abdullah Jendi and Ors.

Smt. Priyali Dattatraya @ Rajendra Jagtap and Ors. Vs Icici Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd.

The Chembur Gymkhana through Its Executive Secretary Mr. Vijay Padlekar Vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai

Naushad Jalili Vs B S Raghvendra Bhatt and Ors.