Trimaan Singh Chandock v. Dynamic Restaurants Pvt. Ltd. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
The court disposed of a Company Application that did not survive as its parent Company Appeal had already been disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
sg
caa9-15.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 9 OF 2015 IN COMPANY APPEAL NO.19 OF 2015 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.86 OF 2014
Trimaan Singh Chandock ...Applicant vs. Dynamic Restaurants Pvt. Ltd. And Anr. ...Respondents
Ms. Tanuja D'souza, i/b. Nankani & Associates, for the Applicant.
Ms. Rujuta Joshi, i/b. ALMT Legal, for the Respondents.
..... CORAM: S.C. GUPTE, J.
DATE : 9 JULY, 2015.
P. C. :-
. The Company Appeal having already been disposed of, the Company Application does not survive and the same is disposed of.
(S. C. GUPTE, J.)
1 of 1
Trimaan Singh Chandock
Dynamic Restaurants Pvt. Ltd.
S. C. Gupte
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court