Dismissed

Jagdish Harikishan Sharma v. Hajarilal Yadram Gupta and Ors.

Bombay HC11 Dec 2015CAA/1326/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court dismissed an application by a third party seeking modification of an earlier order. The court held the application was not maintainable as the underlying appeal had been withdrawn and the applicant failed to state the legal basis for the application.

What did the court decide?

Application dismissed on grounds of non-maintainability due to withdrawal of underlying appeal and lack of specified legal basis.

Jagdish Harikishan Sharma Vs Hajarilal Yadram Gupta and Ors. — Property and Title | Bombay HC (2015)

¶1

9 caa1326-15.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1326 OF 2015 IN

¶4

APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.969 OF 2015

¶5

Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders. Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Prothonotary's orders

¶6

Mr.Atul S. Singh for the applicant

¶7

Mr.Dilip Shukla for the appellant

¶8

Mr.Owen Menezes i/b Mr.D.D.Singh for the respondent no.2

¶9

CORAM : K.K.TATED, J. DATED : 11/12/2015

¶10

PC :

¶11

1 Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

¶12

2 This application is preferred by third party for modification of the order dated 4.8.2015 passed by this court in Appeal from Order (ST) No.18303 of 2015 with Civil Applications by which the Appeal from Order stands dismissed as withdrawn.

¶13

3 The learned counsel for the applicant submits that their interest is affected by the said order passed by this court particularly paragraph 5(b) by which the appellants/plaintiffs agreed to hand over possession of the property to the respondent no.2.

1/2

Mohite

9 caa1326-15.doc

4 On the other hand, the learned counsel for the appellant original plaintiff submits that they already withdrew L.C.Suit No.1843 of 2015 on 26.11.2015. To that effect, he has placed on record copy of the said order. Same is taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. He submits that in view of the withdrawal of the Suit itself, nothing survives in the present Civil Application.

¶18

5 When this court called upon the advocate for the applicant who was not party to the Suit and or Appeal from Order, to point out under which provision he has preferred this application in disposed of Appeal from Order, he was not in a position to show the same. It is to be noted that Appeal from Order is already disposed of by this court as withdrawn by the applicant original plaintiff.

¶19

6 Hence, the present application is not maintainable. Same is dismissed.

¶20

(K.K.TATED, J.)

¶21

2/2

¶22

Mohite

Jagdish Harikishan Sharma v. Hajarilal Yadram Gupta and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jagdish Harikishan Sharma v. Hajarilal Yadram Gupta and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Polycab Wires Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Lanco Infratech Limited

Indiacom Ltd. Vs M/S Eltec Corporation a Firm and 2 Ors.

M/S Neven Textile Engineers Vs M/S v.K.S.Projects Ltd. and 3 Ors.

Narendra Kumar Ram Achal Sharma and Anr. Vs Harish Ramkrishna Prabhu and Anr.

Atul Manikchand Katariya Vs the Municipal Corporation of the City of Pune

The State of Maharashtra through the Executive Engineer Raigad Vs M/S. Patwardhan Infrasturcture Pvt. Ltd.