These civil applications were disposed of as infructuous due to prior orders passed by this Court in other related applications filed by the Respondent State. No substantive legal proposition or relief was determined.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 CA8193,8194,8395,8396/13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8193 OF 2013
in
Writ Petition No. 3540 of 2013
with
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8194 OF 2013
in
Writ Petition No. 3484 of 2013
with
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8395 OF 2013
in
Writ Petition No. 3510 of 2013
with
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8396 OF 2013
in
Writ Petition No. 3481 of 2013
The Maharashtra State Examination
Council
Applicant
V E R S U S
The State of Maharashtra and
others
Respondents
Mr. A.R. Nikam, Advocate for the applicant
Mr. S.D. Kaldate, AGP for the respondent/State
CORAM : A. V. NIRGUDE &
V. K. JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : 28th August, 2015
PER COURT :-
1.These Civil Applications are infructuous
because of certain orders passed by this Court in
other Civil Applications filed by the State of
2 CA8193,8194,8395,8396/13 Maharashtra. Therefore, these applications are disposed of as infructuous. ( V.K. JADHAV, J. ) ( A.V. NIRGUDE, J. )
SRM/28/8/15
The Maharashtra State Examination Council
The State of Maharashtra
A. V. NIRGUDE
V. K. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court