These two applications were disposed of by the High Court Bench after granting leave to amend within two weeks. The judgment contains no substantive reasoning.
Leave to amend granted within two weeks; both applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ca768.15.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 768 OF 2015 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 10592 OF 2014
Balasaheb Vitthalrao Surwase & others .. APPLICANTS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & others .. RESPONDENTS
Mr. H.A.Joshi, advocate for applicants. Mr. S.K. Kadam, AGP for the State.
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 769 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 8594 OF 2013
Mahadevo Shahajirao Muley & another .. APPLICANTS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others .. RESPONDENTS
Mr. H.A.Joshi, advocate for applicants. Mr. S.K. Kadam, AGP for the State.
=====
CORAM : R.M. BORDE & P. R. BORA, JJ. DATE : 20th JANUARY, 2015.
PER COURT :
applications are disposed of.
( P. R. BORA ) ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE JUDGE
dyb
Balasaheb Vitthalrao Surwase & others
Mahadevo Shahajirao Muley & another
The State of Maharashtra & others
R.M. Borde
P. R. Bora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
