The single-judge bench allowed the interim application and disposed of it, while fixing the underlying writ petition for final hearing.
The application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B) and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CA 5570/13 in WP 5092/96
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5570/2013
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.5092/1996
Wahajuddin Salim s/o Mira Mohiuddin.
...Applicant..
Versus
Vijay Laxmi w/o Balajirao Motewar
and others.
...Respondents...
.....
Shri Y.M. Khan, Advocate for applicant.
Shri V.D. Gunale, Advocate for respondent no.1.
Shri S.P. Daund, AGP for respondent nos.2 to 6.
.....
CORAM: SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE: 10.07.2015
ORDER :
For the reasons stated in the application, the same
stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (B) and disposed
of. Fix Writ Petition No.5092/1996 for final hearing in
the week commencing from 1st October, 2015.
(SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.)
ndk/ c1071527.doc
Wahajuddin Salim
Vijay Laxmi
Sunil P. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court