The High Court of Bombay disposed of two company petitions and an accompanying application as withdrawn on the application of the learned Advocate for the petitioners, granting liberty to file fresh petitions if advised.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cp 336 of 2013 (916).sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION NO.336 OF 2013 WITH COMPANY APPLICATION 464 OF 2014
Akai Steels Ltd. … Petitioner
V/s.
M/s. Shree Ram Urban Infrastructures Ltd. … Respondent WITH COMPANY PETITION NO.350 OF 2013
Navinchandra Steels Ltd.
… Petitioner
versus
M/s. Shree Ram Urban Infrastructures Ltd. … Respondent
Ms. Sarojini Patel i/by M/s. Singhania and Co., for Petitioners. Mr. Vaibhav Sadavarte i/by M/s. Jayakar and Partners, for Respondent. Dr. T. Pandian, ROC, present.
CORAM: S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.
DATE: 9th JANUARY, 2015
P.C.:
withdraw the above Company Petitions with liberty to file fresh Petitions if so advised. The above Company Petitions as well as Company Application No.464 of 2014 are accordingly disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as sought.
( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. )
1/1
ssp
Akai Steels Ltd.
Navinchandra Steels Ltd.
M/s. Shree Ram Urban Infrastructures Ltd.
S.J. Kathawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
