This is an oral order disposing of a civil application for condonation of delay. The applicant was not present for respondent No. 4. The Court allowed the application for condonation of delay in the interest of justice.
Application for condonation of delay allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4508.15ca
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4508 OF 2015 IN
FIRST APPEAL NO. 7933 OF 2015
Prakash s/o Narayan Jartare, Age: 65 years, Occ: Agri., R/o. Mudkhed, Tq. Mudkhed, Dist. Nanded.
...Applicant
versus
The State of Maharashtra Through Collector, Nanded & ors
...Respondents
Mr. G.G. Suryawanshi, Advocate for applicant Mr. G.R. Ingole, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1 & 2
CORAM : N.W. SAMBRE, J.
DATE : 21st JULY, 2015
ORAL ORDER :
None appears for non applicant No.4 though served.
cause cited in the application and in the interest of justice, the application for condonation of delay is allowed.
[ N.W. SAMBRE, J. ]
Tupe/21.07.15
1 issue framed by the court
Whether delay in filing the present application should be condoned.
Prakash s/o Narayan Jartare
The State of Maharashtra Through Collector, Nanded
N.W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
