Court disposed of the civil application on the ground that it was not pressed by the learned counsel for the applicants.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4346 OF 2004 IN
SECOND APPEAL NO.752 OF 2003
Roshanbee w/o Shaikh Mirajoddin Inamdar and ors.
..Applicants
Versus
meenakshi w/o Shamprasad Kayastha and ors.
..Respondents
Mr S.S. Shete, Advocate for applicants Mr A.S. Bajaj, Advocate for respondent No.1
CORAM : N.W. SAMBRE, J.
DATE : 13th July 2015
PER COURT
( N.W. SAMBRE, J.)
vvr
Roshanbee w/o Shaikh Mirajoddin Inamdar and ors.
Meenakshi w/o Shamprasad Kayastha and ors.
N.W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
