The court allowed civil applications seeking to add legal representatives of the sole respondent to the records of the second appeals within two weeks.
Applications allowed; amendment to add legal representatives of the sole respondent required within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 -
CA 3491/15 in SA 505/13 & another
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3491/2015
IN
SECOND APPEAL NO.505/2013
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3492/2015
IN
SECOND APPEAL NO.506/2013
Bapurao Karbhari Janjal & others.
...Applicants..
Versus
Sukdev Punjaji Nirmal,
died, through L.Rs.
Rajendra & others.
...Respondents...
.....
Shri Ajinkya Deshmukh, Advocate h/f Shri A.V. Hon,
Advocate for applicants.
Shri P.S. Dighe, Advocate for respondent.
.....
CORAM: N.W. SAMBRE, J.
DATE: 07.07.2015
ORDER :
Both these applications are preferred for bringing
L.Rs. of sole respondent on record. The applications are
within time and since are not objected, stand allowed in
terms of prayer clause (A). Amendment be carried out
CA 3491/15 in SA 505/13 & another
within two weeks from today. Failure to carry out
amendment within the stipulated period shall result in
dismissal of the matter without reference to Court.
ndk/ c771515.doc
Bapurao Karbhari Janjal & others
Sukdev Punjaji Nirmal
N.W. SAMBRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court