A single judge disposed of an application rejected because the respondent's counsel failed to deposit the required amount of Rs. 1,00,000 as ordered by the Court previously.
Application rejected; liberty to re-apply after depositing Rs. 1,00,000.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
DNYANOBA BABASAHEB SOLANKE AND ANR V/S SHALANBAI ABASAHEB SOLANKE
| Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders |
Court’s or Judge’s orders |
|---|---|
| Mr. P.N. Kalani, Advocate for applicants. Mr. M.B. Bharaswadkar, Advocate for respondent. |
|
| CORAM : T.V. NALAWADE, J. DATED : 24th June, 2015. |
|
| PER COURT : 1. Seen the order made by this Court on 29.4.2015 |
|
| in First Appeal No. 770/2009. Time was fixed up to | |
| 13.6.2011 to pay the amount of Rs.1,00,000/- . The | |
| learned counsel for original claimant Shri. | |
| Bharaswadkar submits that nothing is deposited. | |
| 2. In view of this circumstance, no relief can be | |
| given in the present proceeding. There is liberty to come only after depositing the amount. The application is disposed of as rejected. |
|
| [ T.V. NALAWADE, J. ] ssc/ |
DNYANOBA BABASAHEB SOLANKE AND ANR
SHALANBAI ABASAHEB SOLANKE
T.V. NALAWADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
