Shursen Kumudrao Raje and Ors. v. Prataprao Bhupalrao Raje and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ca171810.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1718 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1719 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1101 OF 2004
Shursen s/o Kumudrao Rajenimbalkar and others
Applicants
Versus
Prataprao s/o Bhupalrao Raje & others Respondents
Mr.R.S.Deshmukh, advocate for applicants. Mr.S.A.Patil, advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr.S.Y.Mahajan, advocate for Respondents No.2E, D, F, G & 30. Mr.S.B.Rohile, advocate for Respondents No.4 to 7. Mr.B.R.Sable, advocate for Respondents No.12A, B, C, 18 & 22 Mr.S.B.Ghute, advocate for Respondents No.3 & 35. Mr.R.B.Deshmukh, advocate for Respondent No.37. Mr.K.K.Kulkarni, advocate for Respondent No.29.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE &
P.R.BORA, JJ. DATE : 15th January, 2015
PER COURT:
These are the applications for bringing on record legal heirs of deceased Respondent No.30 and for condoning the delay occurred in presenting application for the said purpose.
Learned Counsel Shri S.Y.Mahajan, appears for legal heirs of deceased Respondent No.30.
Heard. For the reasons set out in the applications, both the applications are allowed. Legal heirs of deceased Respondent No.30 are permitted to be brought on record. Delay occurred in presenting the application stands condoned.
Both the Civil Applications are disposed of.
P.R.BORA R.M.BORDE JUDGE JUDGE
Shursen s/o Kumudrao Rajenimbalkar and others
Prataprao s/o Bhupalrao Raje & others
R.M. Borde
P.R. Bora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court