Disposed
Bhrasthachar Nirmulan Manav Adhikar Samiti, Nanded v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Bombay HCCA/139/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ca13915.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.139 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO.11666 OF 2014
Bhrasthachar Nirmulan Manav Adhikar Samiti, Nanded
Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others
Respondents
Mr.S.R.Choukidar, advocate for the applicant. Mr.G.R.Ingole, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1 & 2. Mr.M.V.Deshpande, advocate for Respondent No.3.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE &
P.R.BORA, JJ. DATE : 09th January, 2015
PER COURT:
Civil Application for carrying out amendment is
allowed.
Applicant is permitted to amend the petition.
P.R.BORA R.M.BORDE
JUDGE
JUDGE
adb/ca13915
ca13915.odt
{2}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.140 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO.11666 OF 2014
Bhrasthachar Nirmulan Manav Adhikar Samiti, Nanded
Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others
Respondents
Mr.S.R.Choukidar, advocate for the applicant. Mr.G.R.Ingole, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1 & 2. Mr.M.V.Deshpande, advocate for Respondent No.3.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE &
P.R.BORA, JJ. DATE : 09th January, 2015
PER COURT:
Stand over to 23rd January, 2015 at the request of learned Counsel for Respondent No.3-Municipal Council.
Respondents may continue the auction process, however, shall not issue letter of acceptance to the successful bidder.
P.R.BORA R.M.BORDE JUDGE JUDGE
adb/ca13915
Bhrasthachar Nirmulan Manav Adhikar Samiti, Nanded
The State of Maharashtra
others
R.M. Borde
P.R. Bora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court