The court allowed the civil application permitting the applicants to be added as party-respondents to the underlying writ petition. The order permitted a necessary amendment and disposed of the application.
Applicants permitted to be added as party respondents in the petition with necessary amendment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ca10320.14.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10320 OF 2014 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6154 OF 2014
Mirabai pandit Alhat & others .. APPLICANTS
VERSUS
Varroc Elastomers Pvt. Ltd. & others .. RESPONDENTS
Mr. R.P. Bhumkar, advocate for applicants. Mr. A.G. Talhar, advocate for respondent no.1. Mr. N.B. Patil, AGP for the State. Mr. S.S. Dande, advocate for respondents 2 to 4.
CORAM : R.M. BORDE & P. R. BORA, JJ.
DATE : 1th DECEMBER, 2015
PER COURT :
( P. R. BORA ) ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE JUDGE dyb
Mirabai Pandit Alhat & others
Varroc Elastomers Pvt. Ltd. & others
R. M. Borde
P. R. Bora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
