Satish Bhau Kale v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
The single judge rejected the bail application of an accused charged with offences under Sections 307 and 506 IPC. The court held that the prima facie evidence of severe injuries warranted refusal of bail, but allowed a fresh application after eight months due to the accused's clean record.
What did the court decide?
Application rejected; liberty granted to file fresh bail application after 8 months.
What the court decided
6.BA79_2015.doc
Vidya Amin
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 79 OF 2015
Satish Babu Kale
... Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra
... Respondent
Mr. Vaibhav R. Gaikwad, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. S.S. Pednekar, APP for the State.
CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATE : JULY 10, 2015
P.C.:
This Application is moved for bail. The applicant/accused is prosecuted for the offences punishable under section 307, 506 r/w. 34 of the Indian Penal Code in C.R. No. 24 of 2014 registered with Lonand Police Station, Taluka Khandala, District Satara.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted in a case involving attempt to murder and culpable homicide with weapons.
Whether the severity of injuries justifies refusal of bail despite lack of criminal antecedents.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Satish Babu Kale
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
MRIDULA BHATKAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court