Dismissed

Sachin Ramesh Patil (in Jail) v. State of Maharashtra, through Superintendent Nagpur Central Prison, Nagpur

Bombay HC25 Jun 2015BA/782/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Theapplicant sought bail on grounds of prolonged detention and proposed police bond. The court, noting the applicant's direct involvement in armed robbery and pending serious offences including dacoity and Arms Act violations, refused the bail application.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Application (BA) No.782 of 2014 is rejected; no bail granted.

Sachin Ramesh Patil (in Jail) Vs State of Maharashtra… — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2015)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

¶3

Criminal Application (BA) No.782 of 2014 (Sachin Ramesh Patil V State of Maharashtra thr Superintendent Nagpur Central Prison, Nagpur)

¶4

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders

¶5

or directions and Registrar's orders.

¶6

[Shri A.H. Laddhad, APP for State]

¶7

CORAM: A.B. CHAUDHARI,J.
DATED: 25.06.2015.

¶8

Seen the report so also the statement
of the eye witness by name Salma w/o Abdul
Sheikh. The statement of eye witness clearly
shows the direct involvement of the applicant
Sachin Patil in the robbery of Rs. 40,000/-
alongwith other accused persons.

¶9

The learned APP has shown me crime
chart, wherein 11 offences have been registered
against the applicant and in one he has been
convicted. Rest of the offences are serious in
nature pertaining to arms Act, robbery and
dacoity.

¶10

The request of the applicant for
grant of bail is on the ground that he is in
jail from 17-03-2014 which is according to him
a long period and further requested that he be
released on PR Bond.

¶11

¶12

Looking to the seriousness of the
offence, I am not inclined to grant
application. Hence, I make the following
order :-

¶13

Order

¶14

A]Criminal Application (BA) No.782 of
2014 is rejected.

¶15

B]The office to communicate the order to
the prisoner through jail authorities.

¶16

 JUDGE

¶17

Deshmukh

Sachin Ramesh Patil (in Jail) v. State of Maharashtra, through Superintendent Nagpur Central Prison, Nagpur

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sachin Ramesh Patil (in Jail) v. State of Maharashtra, through Superintendent Nagpur Central Prison, Nagpur

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chintaman S/O Tukaram Bhurke Vs State of Maharashtra, through P.S.O. Phophali, Yavatmal

State of Maharashtra Vs Narayan S/O Laxmanrao Ranbhad and Another

Food and Drug Administration Mah.State at Buldana Vs Suresh Chandulal Bhangdiya and Anor.

Vasant Bhauraoji Bhusari Vs Prakash S/O Laxmanrao Ande and Another

Rajiv S/O Dinanath Mate and 2 Ors. Vs Namrata W/O Rajiv Mate @ Namrata D/O Chandulal Wade

Shrishailam S/O Buchayya Midisina Vs State of Maharashtra, through Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Gadchiroli and 4 Others