Gaurav Prakash Kadam v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
In this bail application, the High Court of Judicature at Bombay rejected the granted bail to the applicant charged under Sections 307, 323, 504 IPC. The court held the applicant initiated the assault causing serious injuries and denied bail.
What did the court decide?
Bail application rejected; liberty to file fresh application after nine months if trial delayed.
What the court decided
Sherla V.
ba.382.2015.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO.382 OF 2015
Gaurav Prakash Kadam ... Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
Mr.Satyavrat Joshi for the Applicant Mr.D.P. Adsule, APP, for Respondent – State
CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.
DATE: JULY 6, 2015
P.C.:
- This is an application for bail. The applicant is facing charges under
sections 307, 323, 504, 5046 r/w section 34 of the Indian Penal Code in relation to C.R. No.139 of 2013 registered with the Pimpri police station, Pune. It is the case of the prosecution that the son of the complainant and daughter of one Kumar Dabhole were in love with each other. However, the family members of the girl did not like this. So, her brother and the applicant/accused who is a friend of her brother, told the complainant that he should tell his son that he should not keep contact in any manner with his sister. Thereafter, on 7.5.2013, in the evening, when the complainant was going alone in his car, the applicant/accused alongwith other 2 coaccused contacted him and stopped his car and assaulted him with sword and knife. He got injured. Thereafter, he got admitted in the hospital and
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the applicant facing serious charges involving injury and an inciting role.
Whether the case is fit for the granting of bail under the given facts.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Gaurav Prakash Kadam
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
Mridula Bhatkar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court