The High Court rejected the bail application of an accused charged with dacoity. The judge noted the appellant's bad criminal record and lack of satisfaction regarding future conduct, concluding bail was unjustified.
Bail application is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 ba348-15
sas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.348 OF 2015
Santosh Jayram Bhagat
..Applicant.
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra
..Respondent.
Mr. Niranjan Mundargi with Mr.Vinayak R. Patil for the applicant. Mrs.Veera Shinde, A.P.P. for the respondent-State.
CORAM : MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATED : 20TH JULY, 2015
P.C. :-
2 ba348-15
(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the applicant accused charged with dacoity.
Whether the applicant satisfied the court that he would not commit another offence while on bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Santosh Jayram Bhagat
The State of Maharashtra
Mridula Bhatkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
