Allowed

Ateeq Abdul Rehman Aga and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC29 Jul 2015BA/1077/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the bail applications filed by two applicants charged under sections 498(A) and 306 IPC. Founding prima facie that there was no evidence of abetment or instigation of suicide, the Court enlarged the applicants on bail upon furnishing security.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed; applicants enlarged on bail on furnishing PR bond of Rs. 25,000/- each with one or two sureties in the like amount.

Ateeq Abdul Rehman Aga and Anr. Vs the State of… — Matrimonial and Divorce | Bombay HC (2015)

¶1

1 28.1077.15 ba

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1077 OF 2015

¶3

Ateeq Abdul Rehman Aga

¶4

Abdul Rehman Fair Aga V/s. The State of Maharashtra

¶5

.....Applicants

¶6

....Respondent

¶7

Ms. Anjali Patil a/w Mr. Arun Rajput for Applicants Ms. P. P. Shinde APP for the State.

¶8

CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J. DATED : 29^th JULY 2015

¶9

PC :

¶10

Heard. This is an application under section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Applicants herein are arrested on 21/03/2015 in crime no. 55 of 2015 registered at Chunabhatti Police Station on 21/03/2015 for offence punishable under sections 498 (A), 306 r/w 34 of Indian Penal Code. Investigation is completed and charge-sheet is filed.

¶11

It is the case of prosecution that applicant no. 2 appears to be father of applicant no. 1. Applicant no. 1 had got married to Musarrat on 30/05/2014. It was a love marriage. It appears from the recitals of the F.I.R. that in February 2015, Musarrat had met with an accident. She had returned to her maternal house for taking treatment. Her husband i.e. present applicant was insisting

¶12

ism

¶13

2 28.1077.15 ba

¶14

upon her to return to her matrimonial house and in the course of heated argument, he had informed her that in the event that she does not return to her matrimonial home, he would give her divorce. On 14/03/2015, she was informed that applicant is likely to pronounce divorce. On 15/03/2015, while Musarrat was in her maternal house, she committed suicide by consuming a poisonous substance. On 15/03/2015 itself, mother of Musarrat namely Raziabi Shaikh lodged a report at the police station on the basis of which crime no. 55 of 2015 was registered against the applicants for offence punishable under sections 498 (A), 306 r/w 34 of Indian Penal Code.

¶15

Learned counsel for the applicants rightly submits that wife of applicant had committed suicide in her maternal house. There is nothing on record to indicate that applicant had abetted, instigated or facilitated the commission of suicide. There is evidence to the contrary that wife of applicant was scared that her husband would pronounce divorce, since she had not returned to her matrimonial home.

¶16

Prima facie, there is nothing on record to hold that present applicant no. 2 had in any way abetted or instigated Musarrat to commit suicide. After she had left for her maternal house, there is nothing to indicate that applicant no.

ism

3 28.1077.15 ba

2 had contacted her.

1. Taking into consideration the papers of investigation and submissions advanced across the bar, this Court is of the opinion that further incarceration

¶21

of the applicants is unwarranted. It is made clear that observations made herein above are prima facie in nature and shall not be considered for quashing of F.I.R., discharge application or at the time of trial.

¶22

O R D E R

¶23

(i) Application is allowed.

¶24

(ii) Applicants be enlarged on bail on furnishing P. R. bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- each with one or two sureties in the like amount.

¶25

(iii) Application stands disposed of.

¶26

(SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.)

¶27

ism

Ateeq Abdul Rehman Aga and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ateeq Abdul Rehman Aga and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Santosh Mahadev Baad Vs the State of Maharashtra

Vellapandi S/O Maliyappan Devendra Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Anurudh Ramkesh Chaurshiya Vs the State of Maharashtra

Shankar Nirmal Shah Vs the State of Maharashtra

Selvin Challappan Daniel Vs the State of Maharashtra

Anurag Arvind Sharma Vs the State of Maharashtra