Bail application dismissed as it does not survive since the related criminal revision application has already been disposed of. Order issued in one sentence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
-2)BA89.15
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 89 OF 2015 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 93 OF 2015
Chandrakant Sampat Mate & Anr.
.. Applicants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Mr. Aditya S. Desai, Advocate for the applicants Smt. A. A. Mane, APP for the respondent-State.
CORAM:-M.L. TAHALIYANI,J. DATED : -12/03/2015
P.C.
Not on board. Taken on board on being mentioned for
production on the ground of urgency.
2 Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for the respondent-State.
3 This application is for bail. Since the revision application is already disposed of, this application does not survive and accordingly disposed of.
(JUDGE)
md.saleem
1/1
Chandrakant Sampat Mate
Anr.
State of Maharashtra
M.L. Tahaliyani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
