The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed the criminal application for want of prosecution as the applicant was not interested in proceeding.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
23_appr_33_15 in revn_454_14.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.33 OF 2015 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.454 OF 2014
Mrs. Sumitra @ Sangeeta Mahesh ...Applicant Razak Versus Mrs. Rubina Asif Naik & Anr. …. Respondents ------
None for Petitioner. Mr. V.B.K. Deshmukh, APP for Respondent No.2-State.
CORAM:-M.L. TAHALIYANI, J. DATED : 20th MARCH, 2015.
P.C.
None for the Applicant. It seems that Applicant is not
interested in prosecuting the application.
(JUDGE)
megha Page No.1 of 1
Mrs. Sumitra @ Sangeeta Mahesh
Razak
Mrs. Rubina Asif Naik & Anr.
M.L. TAHALIYANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
