Order allowing an intervener to participate through counsel in the hearing and opposition of an anticipatory bail application and disposing of the application.
Intervener permitted to remain present through counsel at hearing and make submissions to oppose the anticipatory bail application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
907-APPP-919-2015-ABA-1589-2015.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.919 OF 2015 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1589 OF 2015
SANJAY SHANKAR KAMBLE )...INTERVENOR
V/s.
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA )...RESPONDENT
Shri Manoj Mohite, Advocate for the Applicant. Smt.Manjiri Parasnis, Advocate for the Intervenor. Smt.S.V.Gajare-Dhumal, APP for the Respondent - State.
CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J. DATE : 28th OCTOBER 2015.
P.C. :
1 Heard.
The intervention application is allowed to the extent that the intervenor shall be permitted to remain present through his counsel at the time of hearing of the anticipatory bail application and make submissions, with the permission of the court, to oppose the same.
2 The intervention application is disposed of accordingly.
(ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J.)
avk 1/2
907-APPP-919-2015-ABA-1589-2015.doc
CERTIFICATE
Certified to be true and correct copy of the original
signed Judgment / Order.
avk 2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the intervenor is permitted to remain present through counsel and make submissions to oppose an anticipatory bail application.
Sanjay Shankar Kamble
The State of Maharashtra
Abhay M. Thipsay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
