Lata Ramesh More v. Ramesh Dinkar More and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The court allowed the application for restoration of Criminal Appeal No.269 of 2014 dismissed in default and condoned the delay. The matter regarding the scope of appeal under CrPC Section 378(4) was adjourned to allow parties to research authorities.
What did the court decide?
Restored the original Criminal Application No.269 of 2014 to the file and condoned the delay in filing the application for restoration.
What the court decided
APPP 327-15.doc
Anand
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.327 OF 2015
IN
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.269 OF 2014
Lata Ramesh More.Applicant
V/s.
Ramesh Dinkar More & ors .Respondents
Mr.Tapan Thatte, Advocate, for the Applicant
Mrs.Anamika Malhotra, APP, for the Respondent
No.3 State
CORAM:A.R.JOSHI, J.
DATE :11.06.2015
P.C.
.Heard learned counsel for the applicant
in this application for restoration of earlier
dismissed application for leave. For the grounds
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether an application for leave to file an appeal under Section 378(4) CrPC can be restored after dismissal in default.
Whether a complainant in a private complaint has the right to appeal under Section 378(4) CrPC challenging an acquittal order.
Whether the delay in filing the application for restoration of the earlier application can be condoned.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Lata Ramesh More
- respondent
Ramesh Dinkar More
Coram
A.R. Joshi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court