This is a single-line order allowing a criminal application regarding condonation of delay and disposing the matter.
Application allowed in terms of prayer clauses (B) and (C) and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
659.15crapln
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
_____________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders |
______________________________________________________ CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 659 OF 2015 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL St.NO.123/2015
RAMESH S/O CHAGAN VITHORE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Advocate for Applicant : Mr.Patil B.N. APP for Respondents/State: Mr.S.D. Kaldate.
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & A.M. BADAR, JJ. Dated: FEBRUARY 11, 2015
Heard. Perused the contents of the application. Sufficient cause has been disclosed for condonation of delay.
2 Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (B) and (C) and stands disposed of.
(A.M. BADAR, J) (S.S. SHINDE, J)
kadam/
RAMESH S/O CHAGAN VITHORE
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S.S. SHINDE
A.M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
