The State of Maharashtra v. Sainath S/O Uttam Ingale
Case brief
What is this about?
no..odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4 sr. no..odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 6275 OF 2014
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VERSUS SAINATH S/O UTTAM INGALE
APP for Applicant : Mrs. M.S. Patni
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & A.M. BADAR, JJ. DATE : 20th FEBRUARY, 2015.
PER COURT:
1] Heard. Perused the impugned judgment and order. The findings recorded by the trial court, prima facie, are not in consonance with record.
2] Admit. The application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (A) (B) (C) and (F) and the same is disposed of.
3] Action under Section 390 of Cr.P.C. to follow before the Sessions Court, Vaijapur.
[A.M. BADAR] [S.S. SHINDE] JUDGE JUDGE.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court