The High Court dismissed a criminal application for want of prosecution as the applicant's counsel had not appeared since December 2014.
Application dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
58.appln575.2000.sxw
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 575 OF 2000
Miss Tanaz Jahangir Irani. ... Applicant. Versus Dr. Siddharth Ambaji Patel & ors. ... Respondents.
None for applicant.
None for respondent.
Mr. D.R. More, APP for State.
CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV,J DATE : SEPTEMBER 28, 2015
P.C.:
1 None present for the applicant. It is seen from the office noting that none has appeared for the applicant since 15/12/2014. None appeared for the Petitioner on 5/1/2015, 12/1/2015, 24/2/2015 and 2/9/2015. In view of this, the Application stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
( SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV , J)
Talwalkar
1/2
58.appln575.2000.sxw
2
CERTIFICATE
Certified to be true and correct copy of the original signed Judgment/order.
2/2
Talwalkar
Miss Tanaz Jahangir Irani
Dr. Siddharth Ambaji Patel & ors.
Sadhana S. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
