Allowed
Anita Dhanaji Wadikar v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCAPPLN/4836/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4836.15crapln
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4836 OF 2015
Anita Dhanaji Wadikar
...Applicant
versus
State of Maharashtra
...Respondent
Mr. Joydeep Chatterji, Advocate for applicant Smt. M. S. Patni, A.P.P. for respondent
CORAM : N.W. SAMBRE, J.
DATE : 1st OCTOBER, 2015
ORAL ORDER :
Mr Chatterji, learned Counsel for the applicant was heard at length. He has extensively taken me through the content of the chargesheet so as to establish the case of bail, as according to him, the allegations are substantiated on the basis of circumstantial evidence.
Tupe/01.10.15
Anita Dhanaji Wadikar
State of Maharashtra
N.W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court