In a criminal appeal, the Court held an arguable case exists based on the available record and death circumstances. Leave to appeal against the acquittal by the Sessions Court was granted, and the appeal was admitted under Section 390 CrPC without hearing the respondent at this stage.
Application allowed; leave to appeal granted; appeal admitted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 280 OF 2014
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VERSUS BALAJI NAMDEO SHINDE
APP for Applicant -State: Mr. S. B. Pulkundwar
CORAM : T. V. NALAWADE & SMT. I. K. JAIN, JJ. DATE : 23rd March, 2015
PER COURT :
(SMT. I. K. JAIN, J.) ( T. V. NALAWADE, J. )
JPC
1/1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the State is entitled to leave to appeal against the acquittal in the relevant Sessions Case.
Whether the Court must hear the accused respondent at this stage.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
BALAJI NAMDEO SHINDE
T. V. NALAWADE
I. K. JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
