Applicant sought liberty to withdraw the criminal application; it was dismissed as withdrawn.
Application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
915 sr. no..odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 276 OF 2015
SATISH S/O BALAYYA BANDIWAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Shaikh Mazhar A. Jahagirdar APP for Respondent/State : Mr. S.G. Nandedkar
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & A.M. BADAR, JJ. DATE : 22nd JANUARY, 2015.
PER COURT:
1] Heard.
2] Counsel for the applicant, on instructions, seeks liberty to withdraw the application. The application is dismissed as withdrawn.
[A.M. BADAR] [S.S. SHINDE] JUDGE JUDGE.
grt/-
Satish S/O Balayya Bandiwar
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. Shinde
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
