Application for bail was dismissed due to delay in trial and circumstances remains unchanged. Trial court directed expediting trial within three months. Application disposed of.
Bail application dismissed; trial expedited within three months; application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 Cr Application 2433/2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Criminal Application No.2433 of 2015
Dilip Dhondu Koli. .. Applicant.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondent.
Shri. Vijay B. Patil, Advocate, for applicant.
Smt. R.K. Ladda, Additional Public Prosecutor, for respondent - State.
CORAM: T.V. NALAWADE, J. DATE : 18th JUNE 2015
ORDER:
change in circumstances. On merits, the applicant is not entitled to bail. This Court held that on ground of delay caused for trial of the case bail cannot be granted. Seen
the report given the Presiding Officer. The report shows
that in April 2015 learned counsel for accused No.2,
2 Cr Application 2433/2015
present applicant had made application for adjournment as he was not ready with the matter when witness summons were issued. The trial Court has prepared a schedule of recording of evidence from 6th July, 2015 to 9th July 2015. In view this, this Court holds that bail cannot be granted.
Sd/- (T.V. NALAWADE, J. )
rsl
3 issues framed by the court
Whether bail can be granted to the applicant given the delay caused in the trial proceedings
Whether the trial timeline and cause of adjournment would fast track the proceedings
To be disposed of on principles of expediting trial when bail is sought
Dilip Dhondu Koli
The State of Maharashtra
T.V. Nalawade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
