Allowed

Nilu S/O Ramji Bele v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC18 Jun 2015APPLN/2064/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed an anticipatory bail application filed by Nilu Ramji Bele, who apprehended arrest for alleged shortage of 301 bags of pulses under Section 409 IPC. The court imposed conditions requiring attendance at the police station and execution of a bond with a surety.

What did the court decide?

The application was allowed, releasing the applicant on ad-interim anticipatory bail upon executing a P.R. bond with a surety and complying with police attendance conditions.

Nilu S/O Ramji Bele Vs the State of Maharashtra — Corruption | Bombay HC (2015)

¶1

crap2064.15

¶2

¶3

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶5

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2064 OF 2015 [Nilu s/o Ramji Bele Vs The State of Maharashtra]

¶6

¶7

_________________________________________________________________________________ Shri S.S.Thombare, advocate for applicant

¶8

Shri V.H.Dighe, A.P.P. for respondent

¶9

CORAM : V.M.DESHPANDE, J. DATED : 18th June, 2015

¶10

PER COURT :-

¶11

1] Heard Shri S.S.Thombare, learned counsel for applicant and Shri V.H.Dighe, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent/State

¶12

2] The present application is for anticipatory bail since he apprehends his arrest in connection with Crime No. 80 of 2015, registered at Osmanabad (City) police station, for the offence punishable under Section 409 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

3] From the first information report, it is clear that in spite of the direction given to the present applicant, he failed to lodge the first information report and on verification it was found that 301 bags of pulses were found to be less.

¶14

4] There is no dispute that the applicant is already suspended from service and he has no control over any of the documents or the functioning of the Maharashtra State Ware House, Osmanabad.

¶15

5] Learned Additional Public Prosecutor Shri Dighe for the State submitted that the investigating officer wants to interrogate the applicant. That can be taken care of by

¶16

crap2064.15

¶17

¶18

directing the applicant to attend the police station twice a week till the charge sheet is filed. That leads me to pass the following order.

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

(i) Application is allowed.

¶21

(ii) In the event of arrest, in connection with Crime No. 80 of 2015, registered at Osmanabad (City) police station, for the offence punishable under Section 409 of the Indian Penal Code, the applicant-Nilu Ramji Bele be released on adinterim anticipatory bail on he executing P.R. bond in the sum of Rs.5,000/- with one solvent surety of like amount.

¶22

(iii) The applicant-Nilu shall attend police station twice a week preferably on every Monday and Wednesday initially for a period of one month and thereafter the applicant shall attend police station once a week on every Sunday till charge sheet is filed.

¶23

(iv) Application is disposed of.

¶24

(V.M.DESHPANDE, J.)

¶25

dbm/crap2064.15

Nilu S/O Ramji Bele v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nilu S/O Ramji Bele v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vishal Somnath Puri Vs 1 Union of India and Anr.

Dr. Meher Datta Pathrikar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Kerba S/O Nagoji Jatewad and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Sanjay @ Sandip S/O Bhagwanrao Karwande Vs the State of Maharashtra

Pramod S/O Madanlal Rathi Vs the State of Maharashtra

Iqbal S/O Janu Pathan Vs the State of Maharashtra