Two criminal applications were dismissed as withdrawn. The applicants sought liberty to withdraw the said applications, and the court granted the request.
Liberty to withdraw the criminal applications was granted; the applications were dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cr.Applns.16/15 & 3622/14
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.16/2015
Sunita w/o Rajendra Takle
and others.
...Applicants..
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & another.
...Respondents...
Shri D.A. Bide, Advocate for applicants.
Shri S.G. Nandedkar, APP for respondent no.1.
Shri V.A. Bagal, Advocate for respondent no.2.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3622/2014
Chakradhar Murlidhar Kajale
and others.
...Applicants.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
and another.
...Respondents..
.....
Shri P.G. Tambade, Advocate for applicants.
Shri S.G. Nandedkar, APP for respondent no.1.
Shri V.A. Bagal, Advocate for respondent no.2.
.....
CORAM: S.S. SHINDE &
A.M. BADAR, JJ.
DATE: 09.01.2015
ORDER :
Cr.Applns.16/15 & 3622/14
- 2 -
1]On instructions, the learned counsel for the
applicants seek liberty to withdraw these criminal
applications.
2]Both these criminal applications are dismissed as
withdrawn.
ndk/ cr91145.doc
Sunita w/o Rajendra Takle
The State of Maharashtra
Chakradhar Murlidhar Kajale
S.S. SHINDE
A.M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court