Oral order dismissing criminal application after respondent applied to waive service of notice; no substantive decision or legal reasoning recorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
110.16crapln
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 110 OF 2016
Amol Mohan Kakade ...Applicant versus State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Mr. Joydeep Chatterjee, Advocate for applicant Mr. M. B. Bharaswadkar, A.P.P. for respondent
CORAM : N.W. SAMBRE, J.
DATE : 8th JANUARY, 2016
ORAL ORDER :
Heard.
service of notice for respondent.
[ N.W. SAMBRE, J. ]
Tupe/08.01.2016
Amol Mohan Kakade
State of Maharashtra
N.W. SAMBRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
