Disposed

Ramesh Karbhari Misal v. Sahebrao Kashiram Badgujar and Anr.

Bombay HC24 Mar 2015APPLN/1062/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court addressed an application regarding criminal proceedings where the complainant deceased. The court held that as no substantive evidence existed, quashing proceedings was inconsequential, and the applicant was directed to inform the lower court of the death.

What did the court decide?

Directed applicant to inform the Judicial Magistrate, F.C., Amalner, about the death of the complainant.

Ramesh Karbhari Misal Vs Sahebrao… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Bombay HC (2015)

¶1

cria1062.10

¶2

¶3

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶5

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1062 OF 2010

¶6

(Ramesh Karbhari Misal Vs. Sahebrao Kashiram Badgujar & Anr.)

¶7

Office Notes,Office MemorandaCourt's or Judge's orders
of Coram,appearances, Court's
orders or directions andCORAM : SMT. SADHANA S.JADHAV,J.
Registrar's ordersDATED : 24.03.2015

¶8

Mr.B.R. Waramaa, Advocate for the
applicant.
Mr.SachinRisbudh/f.Mr.M.M.
Bhokarikar, Advocate for R-1.

¶9

Mr.S.D. Kaldate, APP for respondent/
State.

¶10

1.Learned Counsel for respondent

¶11

No.1 has placed on record the death
certificate of respondent No.1 issued
by Dhule Municipal Corporation, which
indicates that respondent No.1 has
expired on 13.03.2013. The death
certificate is taken on record and
marked as Article “X” for the purpose
of identification. Learned Counsel for
the applicant submits that in view of
demise of the complainant, the
proceedings itself would stand abated
as there would be no substantive

¶12

2 cria1062.10

¶13

evidencetosubstantiatethe

¶14

allegations levelled by respondent
No.1. In view of this, it is not
necessary to either quash the criminal
proceedingsorstaythesaid
proceedings. The applicant shall take
steps in accordance with law and bring
this fact to the notice of the Judicial
Magistrate, F.C., Amalner, before whom
the proceedings are pending.

¶15

2.The Criminal Application is
disposed of in above terms.

¶16

[SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV,J.]

¶17

snk /2015/MAR/cria1062.10

Ramesh Karbhari Misal v. Sahebrao Kashiram Badgujar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramesh Karbhari Misal v. Sahebrao Kashiram Badgujar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suresh Bhikamchand Jain Vs the State of Maharashtra

Kashinath S/O Dhondiba Kamble Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Rajesh Ratanlal Kale Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Bashirmulla Khurshidmulla Shaikh Vs Ajima Bashirmulla Shaikh

Pandharinath Waman Patil and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Dwarkadas S/O Harinarayan Baheti Vs Amit S/O Shriniwas Rathi