The High Court of Bombay allowed an application to correct a clerical error in a judgment, changing the name of an accused from 'Patil' to 'Lohar' in the operative paragraph.
Direct the Registry to correct the name in the judgment from 'Dhanaji Dilip Patil' to 'Dhanaji Dilip Lohar' in paragraph 32 and issue a fresh certified copy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPA 91.15.sxw
1
JPP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 91 OF 2015 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 91 OF 2010
Sandip Shankar Patil & Ors.
... Applicants.
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra.
... Respondent.
Mr. Umesh R. Mankapure for the Applicants. Mrs. S.D. Shinde, APP for the State.
CORAM : P.V. HARDAS &
Dr. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.
JANUARY 21, 2015.
P.C. :-
This is essentially an application for speaking to minutes for correcting the name of Original Accused No.3 – Dhanaji Dilip Lohar as it appears in the operative part of the Judgment in paragraph 32. It appears that inadvertently, the name of Original Accused No.3 – Dhanaji Dilip Lohar was transcribed as Dhanaji Dilip Patil. The name of Original Accused No.3 Dhanaji Dilip Lohar in the Judgment of the Trial Court as well as in the memorandum of Appeal as well as in the initial part of the Judgment discloses his name as Dhanaji Dilip Lohar and not as Dhanaji Dilip Patil.
2
APPA 91.15.sxw
(DR.SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.) (P.V. HARDAS, J.)
Sandip Shankar Patil & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra
P.V. Hardas
Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
