The High Court of Judicature at Bombay allowed a criminal application seeking condonation of a 224-day delay in filing an appeal challenging the applicant's conviction, admitting the appointed Advocate for the applicant.
Condonation of delay of 224 days in filing appeal and allowing the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPA 479.15.sxw
JPP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 479 OF 2015 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL ST. NO. 1017 OF 2014
Abdul Asuruddin Shaikh.
... Applicant.
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra.
... Respondent.
Mr. Abhaykumar Apte, appointed Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. G.G. Nagrale, Sr.PP for NIA. Smt. V.R. Bhosale, APP for the State.
CORAM : P.V. HARDAS &
Dr. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.
APRIL 27, 2015.
P.C. :-
By this Application the Applicant/Accused seeks condonation of delay of 224 days in filing an Appeal challenging his conviction.
We have heard the learned Counsel appointed for the Applicant and the learned APP and for the reasons stated in the Application, Application is allowed and delay is condoned.
(DR.SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.) (P.V. HARDAS, J.)
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to condone a delay of 224 days in filing a criminal appeal challenging conviction.
Abdul Asuruddin Shaikh
The State of Maharashtra
P.V. Hardas
Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
