Allowed

Anwar Abdul Aziz Pathan v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC27 Mar 2015APPA/409/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed an application seeking suspension of the substantive sentence of imprisonment. Applicants were granted bail for four weeks to perform last rites for their father's death, subject to bond and surety conditions.

What did the court decide?

Substantive sentence of applicants suspended for four weeks; applicants released on bail with P.R. bonds and sureties to the satisfaction of the trial court.

Anwar Abdul Aziz Pathan Vs the State of Maharashtra — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2015)

¶1

APPA 409 OF 2015.doc

¶2

vks

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.409 OF 2015 IN

¶4

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1389 OF 2011

¶5

Anwar Abdul Aziz Pathan

¶6

Firoz Answar Abdul Aziz Pathan … Applicants.

¶7

V/s.

¶8

The State of Maharashtra

¶9

…. Respondent

¶10

ALONGWITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.248 OF 2011

¶11

Algu Muttu Shankar Pandiyan

¶12

… Appellant.

¶13

V/s.

¶14

The State of Maharashtra

¶15

…. Respondent

¶16

ALONGWITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1390 OF 2011

¶17

Inden @ Mohiddin Sayyed Ali Shaikh V/s.

¶18

… Appellant.

¶19

The State of Maharashtra …. Respondent

¶20

ALONGWITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.520 OF 2012 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1389 OF 2011

¶21

Anwar Abdul Aziz Pathan

¶22

… Applicant.

¶23

V/s.

¶24

The State of Maharashtra

¶25

…. Respondent

¶26

Mr. N. N. Gawankar a/w Mr. Manas N. Gawankar, i/by Sharon Patole, for Applicants.

¶27

Mrs. Sangeeta D. Shinde, A.P.P., for the Respondent-State.

¶28

CORAM : P.V.HARDAS &

¶29

DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.

¶30

Page No.1 of 3

¶31

APPA 409 OF 2015.doc

¶32

DATE : 27^TH MARCH, 2015.

¶33

P.C. :

¶34

By this application, the applicants/appellants in Criminal Appeal No.1389 of 2011 seek suspension of substantive sentence of imprisonment and their enlargement on bail pending the decision of this appeal.

¶35

2.2 By this application, the applicants have prayed that they be released on bail for a period of four weeks in order to attend the last religious rites in respect of death of their father. We are informed by the learned counsel for the applicants that the applicants have been granted death parole on account of sudden demise of their father.

¶36

According to learned APP, the applicants have undergone about 13½ years of imprisonment and earlier the applicants had also been released on parole and furlough and there are no complaints of applicants overstaying or committing breach of conditions on their release.

¶37

In that light of the matter, therefore, we are inclined to allow the present application. The substantive sentence of imprisonment of the applicants shall be suspended for a period of four weeks and the applicants be released on bail of each of the applicants executing P.R. bonds in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one or two solvent sureties in the

¶38

Page No.2 of 3

¶39

APPA 409 OF 2015.doc

¶40

like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

¶41

We grant time to the applicants till 31^st March, 2015 for executing P.R.Bonds as well as for furnishing solvent sureties. We further direct the applicants to attend Ambarnath Police Station once in three days between 8.00 a.m. to 9.00 a.m. during the period the applicants are on bail.

¶42

The application is allowed on the terms indicated above.

¶43

The parties to act on the authenticated copy of this order.

¶44

[DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.] [P.V.HARDAS, J.]

¶45

Page No.3 of 3

Anwar Abdul Aziz Pathan v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anwar Abdul Aziz Pathan v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dilip G.Sonawane Vs the State of Maharashtra

Bapu Shivaji Kamble Vs the State of Maharashtra

Dudhnath Dwarkaprasad Varma Vs Mahesh Madhukar Pogurlekar and Ors.

Opara Chilezein Joseph and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Arjun Puna Soni Vs the State of Maharashtra

Vishal Mahindra Gada @ Shah Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.