In a criminal appeal under Ss 376, 354, 377 IPC with a maximum five-year sentence, the Court allowed the bail application by expeditiously fixing the appeal for final hearing.
The entire appeal fixed for final hearing and bail application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
4)APPA270.15
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
CRIMIMNAL APPLICATION NO. 270 OF 2015 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 97 OF 2015
Sameer Vasant Shigwan
.. Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
.. Respondent
Mr. R. S. Deshpande i/b Vijay S. Thakur, Advocate for the applicant Mrs. P. P. Bhosale, APP for the State
CORAM:-A. R. JOSHI, J. DATED : -16/06/2015
P.C.
After hearing the learned counsel for the applicant, on
this application for bail during the pendency of the appeal, it is thought fit that the entire appeal can be expeditiously heard and disposed of as the conviction of the applicant is for the offence punishable u/s 376, 354 and 377 of IPC and maximum punishment awarded against him is of five years.
2 As such the appeal be fixed for final hearing in the week commencing from 6th of July, 2015. R & P be called from the
1/2
2
4)APPA270.15
trial Court.
3 Application is accordingly disposed of.
(A. R. JOSHI, J.)
md.saleem
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application filed by the applicant during the pendency of his criminal appeal should be disposed of by expediting the appeal hearing.
3 provisions across 1 enactments
Sameer Vasant Shigwan
The State of Maharashtra
A. R. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
