The applicant sought condonation of delay for preferring a criminal appeal. The court held that sufficient cause existed and allowed the application.
Delay of 88 days in preferring the appeal was condoned and application was allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
jdk 1 14.cri.appa.1388.15.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1388 OF 2015 IN
CRI. APPEAL ST. NO. 1041 OF 2015
Sopan Raghunath Kashid
.. Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Mr. V.V.Gangurde Advocate for Applicant Mr. A.S. Shitole A.P.P. for State
CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI ACTING C.J. & DR.SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.
DATED : DECEMBER 21, 2015
P.C.:
condonation of delay of 88 days in preferring the appeal. In
our opinion, sufficient cause has been made out for condonation of delay, hence, delay is condoned.
3 Application is allowed in above terms.
[ DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.] [ ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ]
kandarkar
1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether sufficient cause has been shown to condone the delay of 88 days in preferring the criminal appeal.
Sopan Raghunath Kashid
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
