The High Court of Bombay disposed of an appeal in an arbitration petition after parties filed mutually agreed consent terms settling the dispute.
The appeal was disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms filed by the parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Dixit
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL (LODGING) NO.619 OF 2015 IN
ARBITRATION PETITION NO.560 OF 2015
ARSS Infrastructure Projects Ltd.
.… Appellant
V/s. Welspun Enterprises Ltd. & Ors. …. Respondents
Mr. Prateik Parija for the Appellant.
Mr. Amit Vyas with Ms. Rhia Marshall Banerjee and Ms. Nihika Jalan, i/by M/s. Economic Laws Practice, for Respondent No.1.
Mr. H.S. Khokhawala, i/by M/s. Nankani & Associates, for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : V.M. KANADE &
DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.J.
DATE : 8 TH OCTOBER, 2015.
P.C. :
Terms, which are taken on record. The Consent Terms are signed by the Appellant, Respondent No.1, Respondent No.2 and their respective Advocates. The parties are present in the Court. The Appellant, Respondent No.1 and Respondent No.2 have agreed to settle the dispute
in terms of para 5(a) and 5(b) of the Consent Terms.
1/2
APPL-619-15.doc
2/2
APPL-619-15.doc
Arss Infrastructure Projects Ltd.
Welspun Enterprises Ltd.
V.M. Kanade
Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
