This settlement-based appeal, filed in testamentary proceedings, was disposed of in terms of consent terms filed by all parties and their respective advocates.
The appeal was disposed of in terms of the consent terms filed by all parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( APPL 687 of 2014)
vat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL (L) No. 687 OF 2014 IN
TESTAMENTARY SUIT No. 22 OF 1991 IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION No. 121 OF 1990
Freddy Bonny Bhathena and Ors. ...Appellants Vs. Hoshang Pesi Hodiwalla and Ors. ...Respondents
Mr.Sean Wassoodew for Appellants Mr.G.S. Hiranandani for Respondent No.1 Mr.Suhas S. Deokar for Respondent Nos.2 to 4
CORAM : V. M. KANADE & B.P COLABAWALLA, J.J.
DATE : AUGUST 13, 2015
P.C. :
Parties have settled the dispute and have also filed their consent terms. The consent terms are signed by Appellant Nos.1 and 2 and Respondent Nos.1 to 4 and their respective advocates. Hence, the appeal is disposed of in terms of the consent terms. Certified copy fo the consent terms are expedited.
[B.P COLABAWALLA, J.] [ V. M. KANADE, J.]
Vaishali Tikam
1/1
Freddy Bonny Bhathena and Ors.
Hoshang Pesi Hodiwalla and Ors.
B.P COLABAWALLA
V. M. KANADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
