The High Court allowed an appeal by setting aside impugned winding-up orders dated 11 August 2014 and 12 September 2014 disposed of the winding-up petition being after settlement of Rs 1.10 crore between parties
Impugned orders of 11 August 2014 and 12 September 2014 set aside and winding-up petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
appl-647-14.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL (LODGING) NO.647 OF 2014 IN
COMPANY PETITION NO.463 OF 2013 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO. 2365 OF 2014 IN APPEAL (L) NO.647 OF 2014 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.463 OF 2013
Immense Packaging Private Limited ... Appellant Versus The Hongkong & Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited. ... Respondent
Mr. Jayesh Nishar i/by M/s. J. Nishar & Co. for the appellant. Mr. Sonam Shethia i/by M/s. Juris Corp for the respondent.
CORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. & G.S. KULKARNI, J.
March 16, 2015
P .C.
By order dated 13 February 2015 of this Court, the proposed withdrawal of winding up petition was published in view of the settlement between the parties and payment of the entire sum of Rs.1.10 crore.
1 of 3
srk
appl-647-14.sxw
2 of 3
srk
appl-647-14.sxw
CHIEF JUSTICE
G.S. KULKARNI, J.
3 of 3
srk
2 issues framed by the court
Whether impugned winding-up orders should be set aside following settlement between parties
How appeal relating to winding-up petition should be disposed of post-settlement
Immense Packaging Private Limited
The Hongkong & Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited
Mohit S. Shah
G.S. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
