Rohini Pankaj Sontakke v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2_apl_836_2014.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.836 OF 2014
Mrs. Rohini Pankaj Sontakke
....Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. …. Respondents
Ms. K.H. Rajani for the Applicant Mr. Siddharth P. Munghate for Respondent Nos.3 to 6 Smt. A.A. Mane, APP, for the Respondent No.1-State.
CORAM:-M.L. TAHALIYANI, J.
DATED : -2/3/2015
PC
Heard learned counsel for the Applicant, learned APP for the Respondent No.1-State and learned counsel for Respondent Nos.3 to 6. The revision application filed before the Sessions Court by the Applicant has been granted in favour of the Applicant. The Applicant therefore, does not press for any relief in the present application. It is accordingly disposed of.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mrs. Rohini Pankaj Sontakke
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
- respondent
Ors.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court